Talk:K. Marinas' Cyclic Multiverse Hypothesis

From Academic Publishing Wiki

[edit] Initial response

Both the framework and its predictions are unphysical (not even wrong). Science is a mathematical model whose predictions resist falsification by empirical observation. There is nothing within the proposed page that is useful for quantitatively predicting anything and little that is consistent with validated theory.

-- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz3.pdf

Science is a mathematical model. Science is a heuristic process of refinement that uses mathematical models as tools to guide the refinement process to some conventional notion of truth based on an observed congruence with reality. As for the article in question, it may be an inspired piece of philosophical conjecture that contains an as-yet-unified set of descriptive mathematics, and the conjecture is debatable but not verifiable. Within the accepted scientific vocabulary, it may be hard to classify it as a hypothesis in the absence of an operational definition leading to its acceptance or rejection. I would like to see it developed as a featured article in the Philosophy Journal. JCGonzales 21:29, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template problem

I do not understand why K Marinas' Cyclic Multiverse Hypothesis begins with my article, "The Core of the Apple." Please explain.

William K. Vogeler

Template fixed. JCGonzales 23:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)